>see pedestrians at some NON-Church&Lispenard
>> location. see how NONE of
>> them are looking up.
>> see white male in gray t shirt, dark shorts look up.
>> see briefcase man look up.
>> see condi rice lookalike turn around to look.
>>
>
>>> > It does tip off that the filmmakers have interest
>
>> in the WTC.
>>
>> More specifically, that they have interest in
>> people's reaction to the
>> first WTC hit. The WTC itself is not visible in the
>> snippet.
>>
>
>>> > But detractors will say they're looking up just
>
>> because they haven't
>
>>> > seen the WTC in a while.
>
>>
>> if that's all you can come up with as devil's
>> advocate, I feel better than
>> ever about this snippet. Such an objection would
>> be silly,
>> *totally* indefensible, given where this snippet is
>> placed. It comes as a
>> cut right after the helmet-touch, which (we're shown
>> later) is when the
>> first hit is happening. Not to mention the
>> concerned look on the
>> whirling-their-gaze-up pedestrians' faces. Also not
>> to mention that
>> all thre of them whirl their gaze within a second or
>> two of each other.
>>
>> That is a preposterous amount of coincidence, that
>> three pedestrians
>> would suddenly decide to remind themselves what WTC
>> looked like -- all
>> within 1-3 seconds of one another -- and one or two
>> of them would for
>> some reason be gazing up with a WORRIED expression.
>>
>> This unassuming little snippet of just 3-4 seconds
>> is indisputable
>> prove of foreknowledge.
>>
>> Then combine it with the otherwise mysterious fact
>> that no Gedeon
>> footage exists from the firehouse when the 8:46
>> mutli-alarm call came in,
>> and it becomes devastating.
>>
>> The clear picture becomes that at 8:46, two cameras
>> were going:
>>
>> At 8:46, Jules & Pfeifer were awaiting the first hit
>> with a running camera
>> at Church&Lispenard.
>> And also at 8:47, Gedeon was awaiting the first-hit
>> REACTION with a
>> SECOND running camera, somewhere ELSE.
>>
>>
>> Ray
>>
>>